top of page

Purposeful Leadership

Anchor 1

My leadership style evolved over my military and civilian career when I discovered a powerful truth: you can drive exceptional performance by genuinely investing in people's success while maintaining professional boundaries. I call my approach Purposeful Leadership.

Sandy Grass Pathway
Understanding Purposeful Leadership

Understanding Purposeful Leadership:

The Methodology Behind Strategic Support

​

I learned leadership in an environment where orders were clear and compliance was mandatory. As a military intelligence professional who served both enlisted and as a commissioned officer over 25 years, I operated in structures where authority was explicit and the chain of command was unambiguous. When I said something needed to be done, it got done or there were established consequences.

​

I also began to learn what kind of leader I did not want to be.

​

Throughout my military career, I experienced both exceptional leaders and poor ones. Some leaders relied solely on their rank, issuing directives and expecting execution without explanation or support. Others empowered their people, providing clear direction while allowing autonomy in execution and stepping in to remove obstacles when their troops encountered barriers beyond their control due to lack of knowledge, insufficient resources, or limitations of rank.

​

I knew which type of leader I needed. I needed someone who would give me clear objectives but trust me to determine the best path forward. I needed a leader who would be there when I hit walls I could not break through myself, whether that meant securing resources, facilitating coordination with other units, or leveraging their authority to open doors my rank could not open. I did not have this type of leader consistently, so I decided to become that leader for others.

​

This philosophy took shape during my military service, but it evolved significantly when I transitioned to civilian leadership. In the civilian workplace, authority alone accomplishes little. Talented professionals do not respond to directives the way service members respond to lawful orders. They need to understand the why, they need to feel valued, and they need leaders who remove obstacles rather than simply assign tasks. The foundation I had built in the military had to expand and adapt.

​

That revelation led to what I now call Purposeful Leadership: a systematic approach to leading through strategic support and proactive obstacle removal. This methodology distinguishes itself not through revolutionary concepts, but through disciplined integration of proven principles applied with intentional focus on a specific outcome: removing obstacles that prevent teams from achieving their highest capability.

​

The Formative Experience: Becoming the Leader I Needed

​

The seeds of Purposeful Leadership were planted long before I had the language to describe the methodology. They grew from experiencing the stark difference between leaders who relied solely on authority and those who used their authority to empower others.

​

I remember working under leaders who believed their role was to issue orders and ensure compliance. They issued tasks without context, expected execution without explanation, and viewed questions as challenges to their authority. When I encountered obstacles, these leaders often treated the problems as my failure to execute rather than as barriers they could help remove.

​

I also remember the leaders who operated differently. They provided clear objectives but trusted me to determine the approach. They explained the "why" behind missions so I understood how my work connected to larger goals. Most importantly, when I hit walls I could not break through on my own, they stepped in. They used their rank to facilitate coordination I could not accomplish. They secured resources I could not access. They provided context and knowledge I did not yet possess. They removed obstacles without removing my responsibility for the mission.

​

The contrast was striking. Under directive-only leadership, I accomplished tasks but felt like an instrument being used. Under empowering leadership, I developed capability, gained confidence, and wanted to perform at my highest level because someone had invested in my success.

​

I decided early in my career which type of leader I would become. Not everyone has the luxury of learning from exceptional leaders, so I would be that leader for others. This commitment shaped how I led as I progressed from junior enlisted through the non-commissioned officer ranks and eventually to commissioned officer positions. The principle remained constant even as my authority increased: use whatever power you have to enable others' success, not to simply direct their actions.

​

The Philosophy of Purposeful Action

​

The term "purposeful" in this context carries specific meaning. It does not simply indicate having purpose or working with intention.  These are qualities expected of any competent leader. Rather, it describes a deliberate methodology where every leadership action serves the explicit purpose of enabling team member success through barrier removal.

​

This philosophy emerged from practical necessity in my own leadership journey. In military environments, I could issue a lawful order and expect execution. If an Airmen or Sailor failed to comply, the path forward was clear.  I followed established correction procedures, defined consequences, and was supported by unambiguous authority structures. Leadership was often a matter of directing action and ensuring compliance.

​

Civilian leadership operates under completely different rules. When a talented software engineer disagrees with an approach, you cannot simply order compliance. When a skilled analyst struggles with a project, you cannot mandate success. Authority without influence accomplishes nothing. Direction without support creates frustration rather than results.

​

This realization forced a fundamental shift in how I approached leadership. I had to learn that most organizational underperformance stems not from individual inadequacy but from systemic obstacles: unclear expectations, insufficient resources, poor coordination, inadequate tools, or lack of necessary information. When these barriers are systematically identified and removed, performance improves without requiring fundamental changes in personnel or intensive micromanagement.

​

The purposeful leader operates from this fundamental belief: talented people want to perform well and will do so when they have the resources and support necessary. The leader's primary role is creating those conditions through strategic obstacle removal rather than directing every action or evaluating every decision.

​

The Three Pillars of Purposeful Leadership

​

Systematic Connection

​

Purposeful Leadership requires systematic rather than sporadic engagement with team members. This is not about quantity of interaction but quality and consistency. The leader establishes regular communication rhythms designed specifically to uncover challenges and identify obstacles.

​

These check-ins differ fundamentally from status meetings or performance reviews. They serve as structured opportunities to ask: "What obstacles are you facing?" and "What do you need from me?" The systematic nature ensures that no team member goes for extended periods without leadership attention to their challenges, and the consistency builds trust that the leader genuinely intends to provide support rather than merely collect information.

​

Documentation supports this systematic approach. Leaders maintain records not to monitor task completion but to track obstacles identified, actions taken, and commitments made. This documentation enables follow-through.  Leaders can easily return to previous conversations to verify that promised support materialized and obstacles were indeed removed. Over time, this record may reveal patterns, such as recurring obstacles that might require systemic solutions, individual development needs that surface repeatedly, or organizational barriers that affect multiple team members.

​

The systematic connection creates relationship continuity that transcends individual interactions. Team members develop confidence that their challenges matter to their leader and that raising obstacles leads to tangible support rather than empty acknowledgment.

​

Strategic Obstacle Removal

​

The defining characteristic of Purposeful Leadership lies in proactive identification and elimination of barriers to performance. This requires leaders to develop a specific competency: the ability to distinguish between challenges that team members should address independently as part of their professional development and obstacles that genuinely require leadership intervention.

​

Strategic obstacle removal focuses on barriers that fall outside individual team member authority or capability. These typically include resource allocation decisions, interdepartmental coordination, stakeholder management, organizational policy interpretation, or access to information and tools. A purposeful leader does not solve every problem for team members.  Doing so would create dependency and limit development. Instead, the leader addresses obstacles that block progress despite the team member's best efforts.

​

This distinction requires judgment. When a team member mentions difficulty with a project, the purposeful leader asks questions to understand the nature of the challenge. Is this a technical problem the team member has the skills to solve with appropriate effort? That requires coaching, not intervention. Is this a resource constraint or coordination issue that the team member cannot resolve regardless of capability? That requires leadership action.

​

The strategic nature of obstacle removal also involves timing. Purposeful leaders do not wait for obstacles to become crises before taking action. They identify emerging barriers early, address them quickly, and prevent small challenges from becoming significant impediments. This proactive stance creates momentum rather than constantly recovering from setbacks.

​

Professional Boundaries with Genuine Care

​

Perhaps the most nuanced aspect of Purposeful Leadership involves maintaining appropriate professional boundaries while demonstrating authentic investment in team member success. This balance distinguishes the approach from both cold transactional management and overly personal leadership that blurs professional relationships.

​

Purposeful leaders care about team member success in their professional roles without attempting to become friends or becoming involved in personal matters outside work parameters. The care manifests through reliable support, consistent follow-through, attention to professional development needs, and genuine interest in helping each person perform effectively and advance their careers.

​

These boundaries serve important purposes. They maintain objectivity necessary for fair decision-making, prevent perceptions of favoritism, preserve clarity about professional expectations, and create sustainable relationships that do not demand inappropriate emotional investment from either party.

​

The warmth in Purposeful Leadership comes not from personal friendship but from professional reliability and consistent demonstration that the leader takes team member success seriously. Team members experience being valued for their contributions and supported in their professional growth without expectations of personal connection beyond work relationships.

​

The Questions That Define the Approach

​

Purposeful Leadership employs specific questions that distinguish it from traditional management inquiry. These questions reveal the leader's focus and create different dynamics in leader-team member interactions.

​

"What do you need from me?" positions the leader as a resource and facilitator. It invites team members to identify where leadership support would be valuable and signals that the leader's role includes providing that support. This question fundamentally differs from "What is your status?" which positions the leader as evaluator and supervisor.

​

"Are you waiting on anything from me?" addresses a common organizational problem: work stalled because someone is waiting for leadership input, approval, or action. This question proactively identifies these situations rather than allowing them to persist until they create delays.

​

"What obstacles are preventing progress?" focuses attention on barriers rather than merely outcomes. It signals that the leader understands challenges exist and takes responsibility for helping address them rather than simply expecting team members to overcome all difficulties independently.

​

"What solutions have you considered?" balances supportive leadership with development. Before removing an obstacle, the purposeful leader often asks what approaches the team member has thought about. This question serves two purposes: it provides insight into the team member's problem-solving capability and development needs, and it ensures the leader does not solve problems that the team member could address with appropriate guidance rather than direct intervention.

​

These questions become habitual in Purposeful Leadership, shaping both the nature of conversations and the expectations team members develop about their leader's role.

​

How Purposeful Leadership Creates Value

​

The methodology creates specific benefits that translate into organizational performance:

​

Reduced Crisis Management: By identifying and addressing obstacles proactively, purposeful leaders prevent many problems from escalating into crises. This creates calmer, more predictable work environments where teams can focus on productive work rather than constantly firefighting.

​

Faster Problem Resolution: When obstacles do arise, the systematic check-in process ensures they are identified quickly and addressed with appropriate resources. Problems that might otherwise persist for weeks while team members attempt various solutions or wait for opportunities to raise issues get resolved in sooner.

​

Improved Team Capability: As purposeful leaders remove systemic obstacles and provide strategic support, team members develop greater capability to focus their skills on meaningful work. They spend less time navigating organizational complexities and more time applying their expertise to their actual responsibilities.

​

Enhanced Trust and Engagement: The consistent demonstration that leadership takes team member challenges seriously and follows through on commitments builds trust. This trust translates into higher engagement, greater willingness to communicate openly about problems, and improved retention of valuable team members.

​

Better Resource Utilization: By maintaining systematic awareness of team member challenges and needs, purposeful leaders make more informed decisions about resource allocation, identify opportunities for process improvement, and recognize patterns that suggest systemic issues requiring attention.

​

The Evolution Required for Implementation

​

Implementing Purposeful Leadership often requires significant evolution in how leaders think about their role, particularly for those with backgrounds in authority-based environments or traditional command-and-control management. I know this evolution intimately because I lived it.

​

The transition involves moving from seeing leadership as primarily directing and evaluating to viewing it as primarily enabling and supporting. This shift was very uncomfortable for me at first. I had spent years developing competence in giving clear orders, maintaining standards, and ensuring accountability through established structures. Suddenly, those skills mattered less than my ability to ask the right questions, identify hidden obstacles, and facilitate solutions rather than mandate them.

​

This does not mean abandoning standards or expectations. I still maintain clear expectations for performance and hold team members accountable. However, the primary leadership energy focuses on creating conditions for success rather than monitoring compliance. In military operations, I could ensure compliance through authority. In civilian leadership, I had to earn influence through demonstrated support and consistent follow-through.

​

Leaders must also develop comfort with a different kind of vulnerability. Asking "What do you need from me?" and "Are you waiting on anything from me?" requires acknowledging that leadership support is necessary and that leaders may sometimes fall short in providing it. This honest acknowledgment creates stronger relationships than maintaining the fiction that good team members should never need leadership help.

​

The approach also requires developing specific competencies many leaders lack: systematic follow-through, disciplined documentation, strategic problem-solving that addresses root causes rather than symptoms, and the judgment to distinguish between obstacles requiring intervention and challenges that serve developmental purposes. These skills differ significantly from traditional command competencies, and developing them requires intentional effort and practice.

​

Integration with Other Leadership Responsibilities

​

Purposeful Leadership does not replace the other essential leadership functions like setting direction, establishing expectations, providing feedback, making decisions, and developing team capability. Rather, it provides a framework for executing these functions more effectively by ensuring that obstacles to their successful implementation are systematically addressed.

​

A purposeful leader still sets clear objectives and holds team members accountable for results. The difference lies in also taking responsibility for ensuring that team members have what they need to achieve those objectives. Expectations without support creates frustration; Purposeful Leadership provides both.

​

Strategic planning remains essential, but the purposeful leader also plans for obstacle removal. Performance feedback continues but includes discussion of obstacles the leader can help address. Professional development remains important but considers what barriers prevent team members from applying new capabilities.

​

The Distinction from Similar Approaches

​

Purposeful Leadership shares characteristics with servant leadership, transformational leadership, and coaching-oriented leadership while maintaining distinct features that define its particular approach.

​

Unlike servant leadership, which emphasizes the leader's servant role across all dimensions, Purposeful Leadership specifically focuses that service on obstacle removal rather than meeting all team member needs. The boundaries are clearer and the focus more targeted.

​

Unlike purely transformational leadership, which emphasizes inspiring vision and changing organizational culture, Purposeful Leadership concentrates on practical, systematic support regardless of whether transformation is the goal. It works equally well in stable environments as in periods of change.

​

Unlike coaching-focused leadership, which emphasizes developing team member capability through questioning and guidance, Purposeful Leadership includes direct intervention to remove obstacles that team members cannot address regardless of their capability development.

​

The purposeful leader coaches when appropriate, inspires when necessary, and serves strategically but the defining characteristic remains systematic identification and removal of obstacles that impede team performance.

​

Conclusion

​

Purposeful Leadership represents a disciplined approach to achieving results through strategic support of capable people. It requires leaders to develop specific practices with systematic check-ins, strategic questioning, proactive problem-solving while maintaining professional boundaries that create sustainable, effective relationships.

​

I developed this approach through necessity, trial, and occasional failure as I transitioned from military to civilian leadership. The principles that work in combat zones and on crisis response teams do not automatically translate to corporate environments, but the underlying commitment to enabling team success applies universally. What changed was the methodology.  I moved from authority-based direction to influence-based support, from command to facilitation, from compliance monitoring to obstacle removal.

​

The approach does not promise easy implementation or universal applicability. It requires investment of time and energy, development of new competencies, and organizational support for leaders to effectively remove the obstacles they identify. The evolution from traditional leadership to Purposeful Leadership can feel uncomfortable, particularly for leaders accustomed to authority-based structures. However, for leaders willing to make that investment and embrace that evolution, Purposeful Leadership offers a path to higher performance through better support rather than tighter control.

​

My 25 years of military experience taught me how to lead with authority. My civilian experience taught me that authority alone is insufficient. Purposeful Leadership represents the integration of those lessons, maintaining the systematic discipline and focus on mission accomplishment from my military background while embracing the influence-based, support-oriented approach that civilian leadership requires.

​

Understanding what Purposeful Leadership is and is not provides the foundation for effective implementation. The subsequent articles in this series will explore that implementation in greater detail, addressing common challenges, providing practical frameworks, and offering guidance for adapting this approach to various organizational contexts and leadership situations.

bottom of page